Personally, I think that it is much easier to be with someone who is just like you. I used to think that being comparable and have a lot of things in common was just a waste of time. It doesn’t matter if both of you spend your weekend dancing to flamenco or doing yoga or flying out to check out the reunion of the Police together. If you are in love then there is a glue that would keep you together glued to each other side by side through out time. Purely incorrect. Why? I hear you asking.
Well, if talking about my personal experience the whole world of ‘’artistic differences’’ opens up. From my own experience; I cannot be with someone more successful then me because well I guess it comes from deeply hidden, splinter of feminism which I have been fighting so many years and also of the constant remainders that in roughly the same amount of years, he was able to achieve much then me! Comparing yourself to your man? I hear you say, perhaps, but more like criticizing myself against him.
It has come to my constant tension that some women are happy sitting at home and looking after children and being the ‘’homemaker’’ while the husbands are the ‘’bread makers’’. However I cannot feel sorry for such existence, as it does not look particularly exciting but after all it is their choice and living in a free-speech mind-set country I suppose, I do have to respect the choice that women in this country have. For instance India is this subject matter is a world away.
When women marry and become daughters-in-law; they are one of the most important forces within the family: baring children and all and if educated, calculating the finances. However after their husband dies they have no value; they are simply thought of just the objects (in a way resembling pornography where a women is projected as just a object of sex and not merely a someone you might love) and so, they are forced out of their own homes where they lived and have to go and find their own place to live in. Most have no education and do not even acknowledge, the law enforcement which validates women rights after the marital status is broken down by the death of spouse and allows them to gain much of their assets. However the assets of these women are taken away because they are suppressed by the enforced traditions and go and live in exile with other widows in a town called Vrindavan (actually a city of widows which have been rejected by their own families and thought of us ‘’bad luck’’; those which became a zero the minute they because them).
In contrast there are wives of millioners which are supposed to be awarded by court half of the assets gained during marriage (by the British lords of laws of course) and are merely thought of as getting enough for the compensation that they have brought to the marriage in which the husband was able to get to where he is today. However a women who is a millioner ;computer tycoon was forced to award her none working husband exactly half of their estimated fortune on the basis ‘’to maintain his previous life style’’ .
Is this really the world and the society that we live in today? Are you still telling me that women and men have the same rights? Or is this just merely covered up by the officials in the west, unlike in the rural countries that treat women like that on the basis of traditions, instead of out of mere severe gamble-toll based their own integrity of being ‘’the man’’?

I hate diversity and all the essences of it
[524x360]