WHY AM I FOR PUTIN.
Reading recently advertising various candidates for the post of President of the Russian Federation, I catch myself thinking that people do not realize what Russia is in the global sense.
Studying the history of our Great Country, she certainly had a special mission at all times.
This mission is well known to everyone - to protect this fragile world from chaos and injustice.
Strangely enough, almost any conflict that began anywhere in the world, somehow comes to Russia, and almost everyone is initiated to harm Russia and its citizens.
Therefore, Russia has to end these conflicts.
The role of Russia in world history can not be overestimated.
Some particularly ungrateful peoples of Europe and the rest of the world should remember that they themselves owe their existence to Russia.
Russia has saved these nations more than once.
And, being saved, these nations came back again, in a single impulse to express their "gratitude" and be saved again.
It is true that Russia takes this "gratitude" very high price.
I do not need to prove that our "Western partners" do not need strong Russia.
Strong Russia is the salvation of many peoples from the colonial ambitions of Western "partners" that survive only through the extermination and seizure of foreign territories.
Strong Russia is a disruption of treacherous and treacherous plans to destabilize the world order and destroy Russia.
It's really not interesting for me to analyze the economic and social programs of the presidential candidates, but their intentions to build relations with Western so-called "partners" are very interesting.
Here are excerpts from the pre-election programs.
Candidate N ... th :
" We will reconcile with the civilized world, stop aggression against Ukraine and thus achieve the lifting of sanctions that prevent our entrepreneurs from trading with the outside world and taking cheap loans in the world financial markets."
" Russia will reconsider the format of its participation in the international antiterrorist coalition: political support for the Bashar Assad regime and other similar regimes is not a priority of Russian foreign policy , does not meet Russia's long-term interests and reduces the effectiveness of the fight against terrorism."
Candidate C ... to
"Russia must become a European secular democratic federal state with a market economy that protects the rights and freedoms of citizens, and Russia is an integral part of Europe geographically, historically and culturally ." We must live according to European laws and values - this way will ensure us both independence and prosperity " .
" Russia is a European country, our natural partners and allies are European powers, democratic and prosperous countries.In the interests of Russia there is a strong and not weak European Union.We need to make maximum efforts to restore partnership with Europe, having as a long-term goal the signing association agreement with the EU " .
"Russia is tired of wars, militarism and the situation of the" beleaguered fortress "imposed on us by the current authorities.We must stop the hybrid war that our country is currently conducting in the east of Ukraine.We insist on the immediate return of Russian servicemen to their homeland, in any status of those present on the territory of Ukraine and Syria, it is necessary to immediately publish the lists of all those who died in undeclared wars.
"The restoration of democracy in Russia is impossible without resolving the question of the Crimea.Krym , according to international law, is the territory of Ukraine.Maybe, most of its residents today are Russian-speaking citizens of Russia who perceive their republic as a subject of the Russian Federation.To resolve this situation, a referendum can be held, the order of which must be agreed upon by Russia, Ukraine and the international community.The referendum should be preceded by a period of free public discussion and agitation for at least a year with the Mom that the harmonization of the referendum. "
Candidate G ... n
"I once was in Sweden, they say:" Do you know why we became such a successful country? We stopped our imperial ambitions . "We closed down in our own country and began to study inwardly, manufacturing, and began to think about how to develop the country."
"I remember when I was a young student, a lieutenant-colonel was sitting, shot from a grenade launcher, he said:" Oh, the chrome boots flew. " He was counting money, every shot is money. The flight of an airplane is money . "
Let's ask a question. What is the most important for us Russians in life?
Tell me, American, what is power? Is it money? That's what my brother says about money. You have a lot of money, and what? I now think that power is in truth. Who has the truth - he is stronger.
Dear ladies and gentlemen, it's very cool to talk about how everything will be beautiful and harmonious in domestic politics and tell about rich state employees, pensioners, free business and low taxes. And how can you guarantee the implementation of your policy?
Do not you like Russia's imperial policy?
Then probably you are ready to look into the eyes of Crimeans who believed in a strong Russia, when they tell them that they are returning to Ukraine to be torn to the ukronacists.
Say hello to Donbass and say that Russia will not support it anymore, and now humanitarian aid will be brought by the APU on its bayonets, and it will be distributed in the SBU's dungeons.
Tell the Syrian people that our bases in Syria are curtailing, we will no longer help Syria until it abandons Assad and recognizes the legitimacy of finding an international coalition in the territory of the UAR.
Dear candidates, do you see in each rocket launched on a terrorist, in every combat sortie a lost tarpaulin boot?
Then tell the soldiers of Donbass, Syria, that their heroic deeds and death on the battlefield were in vain. Their activities are too expensive for the country and they in general do not need Russia. Their orders and medals are just the result of an erroneous imperial policy.
Apparently, dear candidates, you are going to agree with the West on mutually beneficial terms.
Do you have an example that they negotiate with their vassals on equal terms? Oh, yes, you are going to declare your independent policy. Have you thought of what you will provide? Do you have a political weight, a team, a plan for real action? Is there at least one factor that allows you to talk with the West headed by the United States on an equal footing? Then I'll open a little secret. They have never spoken with anyone on an equal footing in their entire history.
You offer to be friends with the West?
Then be prepared not to pay attention to the Western policy of aggressive protectionism, treacherous seizure of foreign territories.
Prepare to tacitly accept the genocide and killings of civilians, the arming of terrorist groups, the overthrow of unwanted regimes, migrants from war-torn and troubled former prosperous states that fill Russian cities, to wars at Russian borders.
Where did you get that you will be given free trade in resources and invest money for the benefit of Russia?
Russia is finally on the joy of "partners" will become a feeder and a raw appendage of the West. Perhaps you have not studied history and do not know that history has the property of repeating itself.
You probably forgot that you can only make friends with the West on its bonded terms?
Then you will be helped by an example of a neighboring non-brotherly country. Your policy obviously pursues only one goal - to turn Russian citizens into consumables without a sense of patriotism, pride in fathers and grandfathers, without national self-awareness. In Ivanov, a relationship that does not remember. In tolerant individuals of the neutral sex, endlessly rushing to imaginary European freedom.
Do you even understand that Russia is not a house 2, not a children's camp and not a state farm?
The position of Vladimir Putin relies on an independent policy of patriotism and love for our Great Homeland, which was tested by a hybrid, economic and partly by a hot war declared by the West, a constant intervention in Russia's domestic policy, an ingenious operation to return the Crimea, protect the Donbas and not less brilliant defeat of terrorists in the RAA, an increase in the country's defense capability.
I recognize only this program:
According to the report of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, General of the Army V. Gerasimov, since 2012, 12 missile regiments in the Strategic Rocket Forces (RVSN) have been rearmed for the new RS-24 Yars missile systems.According to open sources at the moment, the Strategic Missile Forces number 82 ICBM "Yars" mobile basing and 12 - mine. The share of modern ICBMs in the Strategic Missile Forces has been brought to 66%, and the total potential for overcoming missile defense systems has increased by 30%.
Work is actively carried out on promising ICBMs, including the heavy-dense ICBM Sarmat, as well as promising types of their combat equipment (hypersonic maneuvering combat units). The Sarmat ICBM will replace the legendary R-36M / R-36M2 ICBMs (SS-18 Satan, classified by NATO) as part of the Strategic Missile Force. The technical characteristics of the new missile, such as, for example, more than 2 times greater than the existing ICBM range of flight, will allow using much more effective types of combat equipment and allow the breakthrough of missile defense systems in any conditions - Sarmat will be able to deliver combat units to targets in the US through the South Pole, from a direction that is completely beyond reach for deployed in the US missile defense systems.
Since 2012, the sea component of the strategic nuclear forces has been supplemented by 3 new submarine missile carriers of Project 955 Borey - Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh. Another 5 submarine missile carriers of the improved project 955A "Borey-A" are in various stages of construction. The last, eighth submarine of the Borey class was laid in December 2016. Reportedly, work has begun to create submarine missile carriers of the Borey B project, which have an even greater level of stealth and, presumably, a large number of ICBMs (the 955/955A submarine missile carriers have 16 R-30 Bulava ballistic missiles).
As Gerasimov said in his report, 102 rockets were delivered for combat equipment of the new submarine missile carriers. Apparently, we are talking about the R-30 Bulava ICBM. Thus, in all likelihood, the production of the Bulava ICBMs is considerably ahead of the construction of their carriers.
The share of modern submarines in the maritime component of Russian strategic nuclear forces is estimated at 82%. This number, obviously, includes the underwater missile carriers of Project 667BDRM that have been repaired and modernized. The introduction of the new 955 submarine missile carriers in the system made it possible to increase the efficiency of Russia's strategic nuclear forces by 25%, according to the estimates of the General Staff. In addition, "Boreas" have an order of magnitude less noise and other physical fields than in previous generation boats and are practically invulnerable in combat patrol areas.
An intensive development of the aviation component of strategic nuclear forces is also under way. On a planned basis, repairs and upgrades of strategic bombers Tu-95MS and Tu-160 are carried out. Modernization consists in the installation of new onboard electronic equipment on the modern domestic element base, which provides the use of modern strategic cruise missiles X-101 and X-102, as well as more powerful engines.
According to the head of the Russian General Staff, it was possible to deploy the production of modernized strategic bombers Tu-160M, and the design bureaus are working to create a long-range long-range aviation complex.
The growth of the combat capabilities of Russia's strategic aviation is estimated as 1.5 times, compared with the level of 2012.
In total, the Russian General Staff has a share of modern weapons in the Strategic Nuclear Forces at 74 percent.
Great attention in the rearmament program of the Russian army has been devoted to the creation and development of precision weapons for the last 5 years to make a real breakthrough in this field.
Mass re-equipment of the rocket brigades of the land forces for the new tactical missile systems Iskander and Iskander-M is being carried out.
There is a full-scale production of sea-based cruise missiles of the Caliber family, as well as new strategic cruise missiles X-101. .
Given the small number of cruise missiles in service with the Armed Forces of Russia by 2012, over the past five years, thanks to mass production, their number has been increased by 30 times.
Work is underway to create fundamentally new high-precision weapons, in particular hypersonic cruise missiles, and the Russian military department is making systematic efforts to gradually "transfer" the tasks of strategic deterrence of a potential enemy to non-nuclear weapons.
Starting in 2012, the planned components of the Russian Flare Attack Warning System (SPRE) are being systematically updated. Obsolete Soviet radar systems of the Volga, Daryal and Dnepr missile systems are being replaced by new stations of high factory readiness, such as Voronezh. P
several satellites of a new "United Space system" in orbit, designed to replace aging satellites space components EWS.
The upgrade of the radar and space grouping of the missile warning system significantly reduces the time for the transfer of information about launches of enemy ICBMs to the highest military and political leadership of the country and significantly improves the quality of information transmitted.
In addition, it was possible to significantly update the space group - in five years, 55 spacecraft were launched into orbit.
Over the past 5 years there has been a large-scale renewal of aviation connections of the Russian Air Force - from 2012 to the present 12 aviation regiments have been re-equipped with new aircraft. Three army brigades and six helicopter regiments have been rearmed in army aviation for new helicopters. Since 2012, aircraft and aircraft repair plants annually transfer over 200 new and modernized aircraft to the combat units.
Air defense missile air defense systems of the country currently have 22 anti-aircraft missile regiments equipped with a S-400 surface-to-air missile system, totaling 46 divisions. Of these, 16 regiments were re-equipped, starting in 2012. Thus, over the last 5 years more than 2.5 times more S-400 air defense systems were produced than in 2007-2012. In total, within the framework of the GPV 2020, 56 divisions are provided in 28 air defense missile regiments with S-400 complexes.
Very high-speed production of the "Pantsir-S1" air defense system is underway. Over the past 5 years, the industry has transferred 19 batteries of the "Pantsir-C1" and "Pantsir-S2" air defense systems to the troops, in which there are 114 combat vehicles.
Systematic re-equipment of anti-aircraft missile brigades and ground forces divisions for new and modernized SAM systems such as S-300V4, Buk-M2, Buk-M3, Tor-M1-2U and Tor-M2 is under way.
Radio technical troops of Russia received 130 new radar stations, which significantly improved the capabilities of the air defense system of Russia to control airspace, and increased the combat capabilities of air defense missile systems.
As Gerasimov said in his report, at the final stage there are works on the deployment of a large-scale group of over-the-horizon detection radar. The deployment of this system will allow us to quickly track the take-offs of the aircraft of the probable enemy and, most importantly, the launches and tracking of cruise missiles at a distance of 1.5-2 thousand kilometers from Russian borders.
In the report of the chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, the share of the air-force equipment with new and modernized equipment is estimated at 72%, the air defense forces are equipped with 68% of the air defense forces and 81% with space forces. The airspace control capabilities, as well as the fire capabilities of Russia's anti-aircraft missile systems, were estimated by the Russian General Staff to increase by 50%.
Thus, we can confidently talk about the very high results achieved in the development of the most priority components of the Russian armed forces, and with a high probability it can be predicted that in these areas the State Armaments Program until 2020 will be fully implemented.
I recognize only this programmatic speech :
"For the modern world, a unipolar model is not only unacceptable, but even impossible."
"The entire system of law of one state, above all, of course, the United States, has crossed its national borders in all areas: in the economy, and in politics, and in the humanitarian sphere, it is imposed on other states."
"The only mechanism for making decisions on the use of military force as the last argument can only be the UN Charter."
"If today the new Secretary of Defense of the United States here announces to us that the United States will not hide these extra charges in warehouses, or under the pillow, or under the blanket, I suggest that everyone stand up and stand there to greet him."
"NATO puts forward its advanced forces to our state borders, and we, strictly carrying out the Treaty, do not react in any way to these actions." - on non-compliance with the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE).
"What happened to the assurances given by the Western partners after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?" - about the guarantees of NATO's non-expansion to the east.
"One hand gives" charitable help, "and the other hand not only preserves economic backwardness, but also collects profit." - on the economic policy of the West in relation to the countries of the "third world".
"The OSCE is trying to turn into a vulgar instrument to ensure the foreign policy interests of one or a group of countries in relation to other countries."
"Russia is a country with more than a thousand-year history, and almost always it enjoyed the privilege of pursuing an independent foreign policy. We are not going to change this tradition today. "
The Munich speech of V. V. Putin
"However, I want to note that the disagreements in the UN have always been throughout all the years of the organization's existence, and the veto has always been ... At the time of the creation of the UN, it was not supposed that unanimity will prevail here." The essence of the UN is to work out compromises. "
"After the end of the Cold War, the only center of domination has emerged in the world, they were tempted to think that if they are so strong, they can decide for everyone." Attempts to shake the legitimacy of the UN are extremely dangerous, which can lead to a weakening of the entire structure. there will be democracy and freedom, in the world there will be more states controlled from outside. "
"The export of revolutions, now so-called" democratic ", is continuing, it is enough to look at the situation in the Middle East and North Africa ... In fact, an aggressive external intervention has led to the destruction of the way of life, instead of progress - violence, poverty , social catastrophe.Human rights, including the right to life, are not put in. So you want to ask: "Do you even understand now what you have done?"
"The expansion of NATO continued after the end of the Cold War, and then the post-Soviet countries faced a false choice: to be with the West or East." Sooner or later, such logic would turn into a crisis, what happened in Ukraine - civil war ... "
"The Islam state" did not emerge from scratch, but was nurtured to combat the unwanted secular regimes, and now the "Islamic state" is expanding its borders - the state of affairs is more than dangerous. "
"It is irresponsible to come out with loud declarations about the threat of international terrorism and not to close the channels for financing international terrorism."