• Авторизация


Reading is the best way to improve your English! 11-09-2009 17:42 к комментариям - к полной версии - понравилось!


[показать]Since I'm planning to go for MBA after I get my Bachelor's degree, I've decided that it is never too early to start preparing for GMAT and that now is as good time to begin as ever. Of course, there is plenty of time left ( 5-7 years to be exact); but I aim pretty high as far as the business program I choose is concerned; so in addition to perfect GPA, a few great references, and some good work experience, I'll need a very high test scores to even be considered.

Although GMAT is somewhat similar to SAT, which I took, in its content, this test is more advanced; and since people who take it have already had chance to prove themselves both academically and professionally, the competition for the highest percentile is more intense. I took SAT two years ago - at the moment I have been in the US for a year - and did pretty well. Out of 800 points for each of three sections, I got 710 in Math section, which was the 95th percentile; 650 in Writing section, which was the 90th percentile; and only 630 in Critical reading, which was the 85th percentile. Taking these scores into consideration, it can easily be concluded that, at the moment, English was my weakest point.

For the past two years, I haven't been doing anything to improve my English: I haven't been trying to memorize new vocabulary, revise grammar, or punctuation. The only thing that I have been doing was reading a lot, both for pleasure and school. Since I'm not ready to take GMAT assessment test because I've managed to completely forget most of Math topics that I revised for SAT, and GMAT, as I understand, is more difficult to grade correctly, yesterday I've decided to do official SAT practice test, which can be taken on collegeboard website and is automatically scored by the system in just 30 seconds, in order to see how far I've come.

Even though these scores are not very relevant for me right now, I believe that they are a good indicator of certain improvement of my understanding of written English and of my active vocabulary. Long story short, in Critical reading section, which was the only one I did, I've raised my score by 90 points, which would have put me to the 97th percentile two years ago. So moral of this fable is as follows: if one comes to the US to improve his/her English, like many au-pairs do, or just tries to learn language at home, do read a lot; it is much more fun than trying to memorize lists of words or a grammar book from cover to cover.

[746x495]

вверх^ к полной версии понравилось! в evernote
Комментарии (19):
Olivia_Brit 11-09-2009-18:39 удалить
Oh, you so smart))) I hate math! :)

Thank you for your advice. English is my problem of today. There`ve been lying somewhere my Jane Austen “Pride and Prejudice” for a long time. I think it`s time to read it at last ;)
self-made 11-09-2009-18:39 удалить
I agree with you that the sooner you start - the better :) You probably know about my attempt of taking LSAT, which was quite a spontaneous decision and didn't go that well. I only bought 1 book with CD and practiced for about 3 months total (slacking, of course, not all the time :), so I got just average score: not bad, but not good either. Next time I will practice until I feel comfortabe and won't jump on it like that :)
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-18:49 удалить
Olivia_Brit, Math is not my favorite subject, but I'm pretty good :). As far as reading is concerned, it's a good way to go. If I were you, I wouldn't even bother looking up words you don't know in the dictionary. Eventually, you'll just understand their meaning without having to find a Russian equivalent. On the flip side, it can be a problem: quite often, I find that, even though I know the meaning of the word, I have no idea how to say it in Russian. It can be a problem if one plans to be an interpreter. By the way, "Pride and Prejudice" is a great book, but I wouldn't recommend it to someone who is just starting to read in English. I think that much better choice would be books written in 20th, 21st centuries because they contain modern vocabulary and are, in general, much easier to understand.
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-18:55 удалить
self-made, I haven't heard about you taking LSAT :) When I took SAT, I've been studying day and night for 6 months. When I took my first practice test, I scored about 1700 and, after all these months of practice, ended up with 2010 on the actual test.

The thing that I hate about all these standardized tests is that they pretty much test not your knowledge but how well familiar you're with all in's and out's of this particular test. Of course, you have to know something to get a decent score, but, if you, despite being knowledgeable, are not a very good test taker or haven't spent much time learning all the tricks, you're pretty much screwed.
tabula_rasa_ 11-09-2009-19:18 удалить
Я вот недавно решила, что таки надо что-то почитать на английском. Выбрала, наверное, самый легкий вариант - Гарри Поттера :)
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-19:22 удалить
tabula_rasa_, знаешь, самое удиветельное то, что, в плане vocabulary, Гарри Поттер не показался мне такой уж легкой книгой. не знаю, может это было из-за того, что я читала эти книги где-то через полгода после моего приезда сюда или из-за того, что автор использует британский вариант английского, но я не знала очень много слов...with this being said, это не помешало мне понять о чем идет речь и получить удовольствие от прочтения, так что дерзай!
Roksolana 11-09-2009-19:35 удалить
ну что ж, молодчинка! Конечно, чтение - это супер, т.к. там и грамматика, и лексика... А лексика - это одно из самых главных в английском, для меня! грамматика давно пройдена, фонетика тоже, само собой, а вот лексики никогда много не будет!!!
self-made 11-09-2009-19:37 удалить
I am not sure about SAT and GMAT, but for LSAT you actually don’t need any prior knowledge, it tests your logic, your ability to analyze and think fast, to group facts together and draw conclusions, and also it tests your reading and understanding of complicated materials. I scored very well on logical/analyzing section, I've always been good at that :) I got pretty high score on the reading section too, but I need to be faster. And the worst section, which significantly lowered my overall score, was what’s called “logic games” – don’t even know how to explain this LOL – like puzzles I guess. I took way too much time on it and as a result I didn’t even start many questions. To my defense, I should say that this section is the furthest from real law, I am not even sure how it relates to it :) I'd say it's more related to math...
My biggest problem with the test was that it was extremely time-sensitive: about 1.5 min for each question. And in real life I like to take my time and double and triple check everything. And honestly, if you are a lawyer, you don’t wanna deliver something very quick sacrificing quality – each little word might cause problem later on if it goes to court, you need to double check everything. You have to be reasonably quick, but not to that point :) Oh well, we cannot change the testing system, so we’ll just have to practice more :)
Roksolana 11-09-2009-19:43 удалить
Исходное сообщение MiaGellar
quite often, I find that, even though I know the meaning of the word, I have no idea how to say it in Russian. It can be a problem if one plans to be an interpreter. By the way, "Pride and Prejudice" is a great book, but I wouldn't recommend it to someone who is just starting to read in English.

The same thing. It means the feeling of language, I guess :) The most important is that you UNDERSTAND, or r u gonna be interpreter? )))
"P&P" isn't that difficult in adapted variant - we've read it at the 1st course, actually, it's even simple...
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-19:50 удалить
self-made, SAT tests your vocabulary, understanding of basic math concepts, and ability to express yourself in writing. As far as I know, like LSAT has nothing to do with Law, GMAT has nothing to do with business. But this is exactly the point I was trying to make: instead of testing how good of a lawyer, economist, or any other specialist you're, they test you on how fast you can answer all those questions and how lucky you're in guessing answers you didn't know. As far as knowledge is concerned, I was referring to knowledge of English language and basic Math, which is pretty much what is tested in both SAT and GMAT. But you're right, there's nothing we can do about that; at least, in America you don't have to bribe your way to college!
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-19:57 удалить
Roksolana, I'm not going to be an interpreter, so it doesn't bother me at all...As far as HP is concerned, I read the original, so maybe that was why I found it a bit tough. But again, it's not the way she wrote that I thought to be difficult but the fact that I came across quite a few words that I didn't know. I should give last two books a try to see if I'll have a different opinion now that I've been living and studying in the Us for two additional years.
Roksolana 11-09-2009-20:08 удалить
I must say that most of the significant tests are like this: they just are on logic and how quickly you can cope with difficulties. When I entered my university (in Ukraine), I also had not easy tests, but the studying was also not that simple... They just check how well you are prepared to meet the difficulties awaiting for you afterwards, i guess, like tests on strenghts... even not on knowledge...
Roksolana 11-09-2009-20:11 удалить
Of course, it depends on the level of English you have when you start reading Jane Austen's "Pride & Prejudice" :) I had already quite good then, may be that's why it didn't seem difficult for me + adapted variant. You should look it through once more, I guesss, and it might seem to you much easier now :)
self-made 11-09-2009-20:13 удалить
MiaGellar, I actually do like the concept of local tests like SAT, LSAT and GMAT more than I like our usual knowledge-based tests we used to take in post Soviet countries. Local tests get to the core: they test your IQ pretty much. No matter what profession you choose, you will never be able to memorize everything you need. What you learn at school is WHERE to find the answer and HOW to understand and to apply the info correctly. Isn't it right? It is true for any profession. Of course, once you start working in a particular area, you will memorize some things and know answers right of the top of your head. But most of it is where to find and how to understand and apply. So I find the concept of testing your natural skills and abilities to succeed in a particular profession very interesting. Of course, it cannot be 100% accurate, you are right that some people are not good at taking tests etc, but still I think it's more effective than testing knowledge: you will learn all you need once you start your study :)
CrimeanGurl 11-09-2009-20:25 удалить
Roksolana, For some reason, I thought that you were talking about Harry Potter, so this is the book I was referring to in my previous post. As for Pride and Prejudice, I myself didn't find it to be very difficult even though it was not the easiest one; however, judging from Olivia_Brit's comment, her English is far from perfect, so there are good chances that she might not find Pride and Prejudice that easy, hence, my advice. As far as my level of English is concerned, I know for sure that at the moment of reading both PP and HP, it was better than that of 85% of (mostly) American native speakers who took test on the same day as I did :)
Every time I read your entries about school or tests, or grades, I'm so impressed with your skills and determination!! You can be a role model!! (you are in some ways for me :))
CrimeanGurl 12-09-2009-01:35 удалить
зажиГалка, thank you very much for nice words :) I'll admit that I like "role model" somewhat better than "заточка who doesn't have a life" as I was recently characterized in one very heated debate on this website :)))
Olivia_Brit 12-09-2009-01:37 удалить
MiaGellar, все, пишу на русском))
Вспомнила о книге на свою голову:) Она у меня точно не в упрощенном варианте. Год назад она мне точно показалась тяжелой, а сейчас попробую пару страниц, нет, буду искать посовременнее.
Еще раз спасибо за советы:) Постоянное заглядывание в словарь действительно убивает всякий интерес к книге, а быть переводчиком мне не грозит;)
telegraph_ave 12-09-2009-04:30 удалить
MiaGellar, you're definitely some kind of a role model because of your academic achivements, your single-mindedness and persistence... you are, at least for me. I remember reading you old diaries while I was in Ukraine, and later, being an au pair, and I always felt a lot of respect to you. I suppose I read the debate you've mentioned before it was deleted -- don't pay too much attention on the inadequate people))


Комментарии (19): вверх^

Вы сейчас не можете прокомментировать это сообщение.

Дневник Reading is the best way to improve your English! | CrimeanGurl - Моя новая звездно-полосатая жизнь | Лента друзей CrimeanGurl / Полная версия Добавить в друзья Страницы: раньше»